Train tickets ‘cost 50% more’ than plane fares - and journey times are much longer too

Holidaymakers travelling round Great Britain face a dilemma between low fares and reducing their carbon footprint
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

It is costing Brits 50% more to travel across Great Britain by train compared to plane, research by Which? has found.

A look at train routes across the country has found a staggering difference in price between the two modes of transport - with train fares soaring despite being a much slower way to get about.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

We want to hear from you: let us know what you think about this story and be part of the debate in our comments section below

Rail passengers face paying over the odds to travel by rail than by air, according to research by consumer group Which? (Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)Rail passengers face paying over the odds to travel by rail than by air, according to research by consumer group Which? (Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)
Rail passengers face paying over the odds to travel by rail than by air, according to research by consumer group Which? (Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)

In response to more people travelling across the UK for their holidays this year, airlines have launched dozens more domestic routes.

Consumer group Which? compared the carbon footprint of flying versus taking the train on 10 UK routes between 3 and 8 August - including Bristol to Newcastle – with flight prices checked on Skyscanner and Trainline.

Read More
Pollution: water companies prosecuted hundreds of times for environmental crime

169% more expensive

A train fare from Birmingham to Newquay would cost customers £113 more than flying between 3 - 8 August 2021 (image: Kimberley Mogg)A train fare from Birmingham to Newquay would cost customers £113 more than flying between 3 - 8 August 2021 (image: Kimberley Mogg)
A train fare from Birmingham to Newquay would cost customers £113 more than flying between 3 - 8 August 2021 (image: Kimberley Mogg)

Eight of the ten routes worked out as more expensive - with Birmingham to Newquay costing an eye-watering £113 more.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The flight cost £67 and a train journey on the same dates cost £180 – an increase of 169 per cent.

The train route Which? looked at also involved making two changes and, including the return journey, would take more than 10 hours longer than flying in total.

However, the CO2 emissions caused by flying are, on average, six times more than those caused by taking the train.

‘Steps to take to cut train travel costs’

The costly dilemma is also putting Brits in an awkward position of raising carbon emissions if they don’t want to pay over the odds to travel by train.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Rory Boland, Which? Travel Editor, said: “As the pandemic continues to cause uncertainty for international travel, many of us are taking holidays closer to home this year.

“Travellers who choose to take the train face significantly higher fares and journey times, putting those who want to lessen their environmental impact at a disadvantage.

“There are steps that people can take to reduce the cost of travelling by train.

“Take the time to compare dates and times to see if cheaper fares are available, and look into what railcards you might be eligible for to save up to a third on train travel.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“You may be able to make further savings by checking if split-ticketing is an option on your chosen route.”

It comes as the UK’s rail network is undergoing its biggest change in decades under restructuring plans.