Government rejects calls from MPs for menopause leave trial as it’s ‘unnecessary’

Ministers argue it may not be the best solution to support women
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

Ministers have rejected a proposal from MPs to introduce a large-scale pilot of "menopause leave", arguing it could be "counterproductive".

The government also dismissed a recommendation from the Commons Women and Equalities Committee to make menopause a “protected characteristic” under the Equality Act in a move that has been described as a “missed opportunity”.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In July 2022, the cross-party committee published a report focusing on menopause and the workplace, warning that the impact of menopause was causing the UK economy to "haemorrhage talent" and the lack of support was pushing women out of work.

But in a response published on Tuesday, the government rejected five of the committee’s 12 proposals.

Committee chairwoman Caroline Nokes questioned the government’s commitment to the issue of menopause.

In a letter to health minister Maria Caulfield, the Conservative MP said she was disappointed that “very little new work has been committed to by the government” in response to the committee’s report. She also expressed concern that the government had ignored what she termed the “significant evidence base” for menopause being seen as a “protected characteristic”.

Committee chairwoman Caroline Nokes questioned the government’s commitment to the issue of menopause.Committee chairwoman Caroline Nokes questioned the government’s commitment to the issue of menopause.
Committee chairwoman Caroline Nokes questioned the government’s commitment to the issue of menopause.
Hide Ad
Hide Ad

But the government, in rejecting the recommendation, suggested that such an approach might not be the best solution to support women.

It also warns of unintentionally creating “discrimination risks towards men suffering from long-term medical conditions, or eroding existing protections”.

The government said that the proposal for a pilot scheme on menopause leave was not seen as “necessary” and could turn out to be “counterproductive”.

It said: “We are focusing our efforts on disseminating best practice and encouraging employers to implement workplace menopause policies and other forms of support such as flexible working, which can play a vital role in supporting people to remain in work”.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Elsewhere, the government said it was “committed to reducing the cost of Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) prescriptions” in response to the committee report.

Government urged to ‘look again’ 

Ms Nokes, who in her letter to Ms Caulfield noted that the reply to the report was three and a half months late, said that it was a “missed opportunity to protect vast numbers of talented and experienced women from leaving the workforce” adding that she is "unconvinced that menopause is a government priority".

In a statement, she said: “The evidence to our inquiry was crystal clear that urgent action was needed across healthcare and work settings to properly address women’s needs, yet government progress has been glacial and its response complacent.

“Its refusal to even consult on reforming equalities law doesn’t make sense and we urge it to look again.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

A government spokesperson said: “We recognise that the menopause can be a challenging time for women, which is why we have put women’s health at the top of the agenda as part of the first-ever women’s health strategy for England.

“We are implementing an ambitious programme of work with the NHS to improve menopause care so all women can access the support they need.

“We encourage employers to be compassionate and flexible to the needs of their employees, and are committed to supporting more flexible working patterns – having consulted on making flexible working the default unless employers have good reasons not to.”

Related topics:

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.