Nord Stream explosion: UK denies Russian claims that Navy blew up gas pipelines

Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now
The MoD said: “To detract from their disastrous handling of the illegal invasion of Ukraine, the Russian Ministry of Defence is resorting to peddling false claims of an epic scale.”

The UK government has denied unevidenced claims from Russia that the Royal Navy blew up the Nord Stream pipelines in September.

Both gas pipelines - which run transport gas from Russia to Europe via the Baltic Sea - stopped working due to leaks and an apparent explosion. At the time, the Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said that “it is the authorities’ clear assessment that these are deliberate actions”.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

There was some speculation that leaks may have been caused by Russia, however now Moscow has accused the Royal Navy of blowing them up.

“According to available information, representatives of this unit of the British Navy took part in the planning, provision and implementation of a terrorist attack in the Baltic Sea on September 26 this year - blowing up the Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 gas pipelines,” Reuters reported the Kremlin said.

Powerful explosions were the cause of “extensive damage” to the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea, Danish police have said.Powerful explosions were the cause of “extensive damage” to the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea, Danish police have said.
Powerful explosions were the cause of “extensive damage” to the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea, Danish police have said.

It also said that the UK was behind Ukrainian drone attacks on the Russia navy near Sevestapol, in Crimea, earlier today. Russia provided no evidence from either of these claims, however said it was raise them with the UN Security Council.

The UK denied the allegations. “To detract from their disastrous handling of the illegal invasion of Ukraine, the Russian Ministry of Defence is resorting to peddling false claims of an epic scale,” the Ministry of Defence said.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“This invented story, says more about arguments going on inside the Russian government than it does about the West.”

The first three leaks were discovered off the Swedish coast, close to the Danish island Bornholm.The first three leaks were discovered off the Swedish coast, close to the Danish island Bornholm.
The first three leaks were discovered off the Swedish coast, close to the Danish island Bornholm. | Gazprom, Danish Maritime Authority

Why are the pipelines important?

A drop in Russian gas supplies has caused energy prices to soar, causing pain for many across Europe and creating fears about the coming winter and putting pressure on governments to help ease soaring bills.

While Nord Stream 2 has never been operational, Nord Stream 1 had delivered gas to Germany until September, when Russian energy giant Gazprom turned off the supply, alleging that urgent maintenance work was required to replace vital components.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Gazprom’s citing of technical problems have been rejected by German officials as a cover for a political power play following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Gazprom started cutting supplies through Nord Stream 1 in mid-June, blaming delays to the delivery of a turbine that had been sent to Canada for repair.

The Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline was already complete when German Chancellor Olaf Scholz suspended its certification on the eve of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February, after Russia formally recognised two Russian-backed breakaway regions in eastern Ukraine.

Were the pipelines sabotaged?

Leaders of Poland and Denmark and experts have raised concerns that the leaks on the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipeline were sabotage.

Sweden’s national seismic network has said it detected two explosions close to the unusual gas pipeline leaks. Danish Prime Minister Frederiksen said that “it is the authorities’ clear assessment that these are deliberate actions – not accidents”. But she said “there is no information indicating who could be behind it”.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

But Frederiksen rejected the suggestion that the incident was an attack on Denmark, saying the leaks occurred in international waters. The Danish Defence Ministry said it also believes “that the violations occurred as a result of a deliberate act”.

While the Nato Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said the explosions were an act of sabotage.

Related topics:

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.