The House of Lords needs reform - but it’s a good thing that younger peers are providing much-needed diversity

Watch more of our videos on ShotsTV.com 
and on Freeview 262 or Freely 565
Visit Shots! now
The average age of the House of Lords is 71 and 70% of peers are men. Despite issues with the appointment process more younger members can only be a good thing, writes Politics Editor Ralph Blackburn

When I first heard that 27-year-old Carmen Smith was being nominated to the House of Lords, my reaction was probably much like yours. Twenty-seven?! That’s far too young to be a peer - what does she know? 

This comes after Charlotte Owen, now at the ripe old age of 30, was nominated by Boris Johnson to become the Baroness of Alderley Edge. Why are we wasting our taxpayers’ money on these youngsters? It would be much better to have some elder statesman, I thought, who can bring their life experience to the important matter of scrutinising our laws. 

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

But would it actually? We’ve already got quite a few of those clogging up the second chamber - where 70% of members are men and the average age is 71. Philip Hammond and Gavin Barwell, who bring plenty of experience of government and Parliament, hardly have the best attendance record. Smith will also be an unusual peer in the fact that she’s Welsh, nominated by independence party Plaid Cymru, who are underrepresented in our second chamber.

Young peers: Carmen Smith, 27, and Charlotte Owen, 30. Credit: Parliament/Adobe/LinkedInYoung peers: Carmen Smith, 27, and Charlotte Owen, 30. Credit: Parliament/Adobe/LinkedIn
Young peers: Carmen Smith, 27, and Charlotte Owen, 30. Credit: Parliament/Adobe/LinkedIn | Parliament/Adobe/LinkedIn

But, ignoring the deficiencies of the House of Lords in its current form, it can only be a good thing that there are more younger voices in our second legislative chamber. We need a diverse range of views and experiences to scrutinise laws, and with most of the chamber old, white men - that’s not currently the case.

How many of current Lords are renters for example, as the Renters Reform Bill is due to be scrutinised soon. How many live in blocks of flats and will understand the importance of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill? Is it appropriate for a body with 70% men to be making decisions on laws on reproductive rights or violence against women and girls? 

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

I was talking to Labour’s candidate in the Wellingborough by-election, Gen Kitchen, about why she became a councillor at the age of just 22. She said: “I looked around on the council and there was no one that was renting, no one that was in insecure minimum wage employment, there was no one that had the student fees I did and there was no one that genuinely represented me in local politics.”

For too long in politics, young people have been forgotten or ignored. In Rishi Sunak’s speech at the Conservative Party Conference there was nothing aimed at the younger generation. No wonder they’ve become apathetic. A recent poll by Prograd found 43% of the nearly 2,300 Gen Z 18 to 27-year-olds surveyed said that they either would not vote or were unsure whether to do so. 

So by all means criticise the House of Lords or the appointment process, but having more young people in our unelected chamber can only be a good thing.

Ralph Blackburn is NationalWorld’s politics editor based in Westminster, where he gets special access to Parliament, MPs and government briefings. If you liked this article you can follow Ralph on X (Twitter) here and sign up to his free weekly newsletter Politics Uncovered, which brings you the latest analysis and gossip from Westminster every Sunday morning.

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.

Telling news your way
Follow us
©National World Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.Cookie SettingsTerms and ConditionsPrivacy notice