NHS: Leicester maternity wards deemed "not safe" for pregnant women after CQC inspection

Solicitors are investigating cases of medical negligence within the NHS trust too.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

Pregnant women and their babies are "not safe" if they go to maternity wards in Leicester, according to the health watchdog.

An inspection of maternity services at University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) found that both of its sites are "inadequate" - with a law firm representing patients also making claims of medical negligence.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Moosa-Duke Solicitors, based in the city, represents several families and individuals in maternity negligence claims against the trust.

Maternity wards in Leicester have been heavily criticised by the CQC. (Picture: Jeff Moore/PA Radar)Maternity wards in Leicester have been heavily criticised by the CQC. (Picture: Jeff Moore/PA Radar)
Maternity wards in Leicester have been heavily criticised by the CQC. (Picture: Jeff Moore/PA Radar)

It comes as the CQC investigate maternity wards across the country - with many of them yielding sub-par results.

Navdeep Kainth and Gemma Lewis, both directors and senior solicitors at Moosa-Duke, called for “public attention” on the trust to bring about “swift and long-lasting change”.

They said: “The latest inspection reports for University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust make for worrying, but unsurprising reading.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“As a firm, over recent years we have been monitoring and analysing the maternity cases we are instructed on and have seen trends emerging in the failures of care received by mothers and babies. One overriding theme is that mums are not being listened to properly.

“Legitimate concerns are simply batted away and dismissed as ‘being entirely normal’, particularly in cases involving first-time parents.

“We have seen instances where a mum has sought help from the maternity units in Leicester’s hospitals only to be turned away because they have failed to recognise the severity of the issue. In many cases, this has led to irrevocable harm to the baby and mum and in some cases tragically the baby was lost.

“We represent families who are concerned that they received substandard care due to a lack of experience on the part of those looking after them. Substandard care that involves incorrect readings of CTGs, insufficient monitoring and poor communication between staff.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The CQC said there had been a “deterioration in the level of care” provided in maternity services at two of the trust’s three maternity sites, the Leicester Royal Infirmary (LRI) and Leicester General Hospital (LGH).

Short staffing, risk assessments and medicine storage were highlighted, with staff being “pushed to the brink” and at times unable to take breaks due to demand. It inspected the hospitals in the “safe” and “well-led” categories earlier this year.

The LRI and LGH also saw its well-led and overall maternity rating downgraded from “good” to “requires improvement”.

A third site, St Mary’s Birth Centre, remains “good” in terms of safety and overall but saw its “well-led” rating drop. The trust still requires improvement, with the CQC issuing it a warning notice to ensure improvements are made.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Responding to the CQC report, it said it was already making improvements, including hiring more midwives, but acknowledged there was “much more to do”.

Julie Hogg, chief nurse at the trust, said: “Improving maternity services is a key priority and many of the highlighted challenges had already been identified before the inspection with plans in place to tackle them.

“However, we take the report and its findings incredibly seriously and are using them to drive further improvements for women and birthing people.

“While we know there is more to do, we are committed to providing safe, high-quality and compassionate care and are encouraged that the reports highlight our hardworking staff and the actions being taken to ensure a culture of safety and openness.”

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.